Thursday, April 15, 2010
Technical Writing Notes
Instead of focusing on writing projects targeted at useless tasks we wrote documents with meaning. Having a project that lasts for weeks with required periodic updates is typical of workplace writing. Having to do a major project with other team members happens often. Working with a great group that is eager and open to constructive feedback, like I had, is rare.
Learning about target audience, rhetoric, and structure have helped improved my ability to communicate with others. The biggest problem I had was email communication. The things learned applying these concepts writing memos can be applied to email writing with the same effective results.
Blogging was the most difficult part of the class. Writing something to post for all to read was a little intimidating at first. I found it harder to write my post after reading the posting of others. I wanted to make sure my posting was as good as the post of others in the class, so the pressure was on. More pressure was added making sure I stayed original while the posting of others was in the back of my mind.
I feel I the class was worth the time, money, and effort. With the class experience being so different than my expectations I ended up learning more than I thought possible.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Publishing
As an editor there is more work to do than just making sure the words are written well. Designing book jackets, writing cover copy, and directing complete rewriting takes a special talent. An editor needs to be a graphic artist, a critic, write copy, and handle writer's egos and different personalities.
Each of the guest speakers has had something in common. As writers we need to be informative, concise, and interesting. Selling books, old lamps, or news it still comes down to being able to put into words ideas to capture people's eye by standing out from the crowd.
Friday, April 2, 2010
Persausion Over Done
Advertising is big business. They put a lot of effort into getting information, developing products and pitches, focus groups, testing, and marketing. Getting an effective message to the right buyer has always been their focus. I had never thought of advertising as a science before seeing this.
As technology changes targeting is getting easier for them. Each time there is a change in technology the ad people adopt it to their use. If we figure out a new way to block ads, like TIVO, they change to product placement. We get pop up blockers, they develop a method to run ads first before your video starts streaming.
As advertisers gain more data and technology evolves I can see each person becoming a specific target. The cable and satellite boxes are addressable and could become the next target of direct advertisers. Imagine getting custom messages delivered automatically to your house.
Friday, March 26, 2010
My Change in Viewing Tech Writing
One recent paper I read was a history report that was written for postgraduate history majors. Knowing the audience helped to reduce my irritation with the frequent use of technical terms I had to stop and look up to understand. When I found other less technical words that could have been used to convey the same meaning it would frustrate me in the past. Now I understand he is just using words his peers understand. Something I learned from this is writing with specific technical terms where they are not needed could unnecessarily narrow your audience.
Another recent example of audience specific writing was the admissions orientation web site. I was directed to visit the site as part of my major certification. This site is intended for incoming freshman to the WSU business program. Many of the items covered were not applicable to someone seeking a second career. Viewing the information from the viewpoint of someone just graduating high school the material makes sense. I will suggest the possibility of creating a second site targeted at more mature learners during my advising session.
Targeting the audience is key to getting the information across. If the material is too technical they will not read it unless the need for the information outweighs the frustration of the difficult reading. If you write in terms that are too simple the reader will lose interest and could miss the point of the material.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Question
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
It was a good job on the rewrite of the sample we were given. The difference between the original, filled with "inside jokes", and Micheal's version shows what a professional document should look like.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Friday, February 5, 2010
Text Book Rhetoric
One of the publishers of my text books, Pearson, has a companion web site. They follow the standard advertising drill of pushing the rhetoric. They build ethos by stating "Pearson is the world's leading education company." They base this on the number of customers. They do not claim to be the best at teaching or the cheapest. A further attempt to build ethos is a statement about awards they have won. The awards were for excellence in book binding. This does not lead me to believe they are the best at teaching.
Pathos is used when they let us know "We aim to help people make progress in their lives through education and information – to help them to 'live and learn'." An appeal to people that Pearson is trying to make sure we move forward and to live. This imperative that we cannot live without buying these books is hard to believe.
Pearson appeals to our logos with "It is known around the world for its independent and authoritative information." If all these unnamed people know about it Pearson must be good. No true testimonials or references are provided at the site.
With all of the rhetoric and lack of any claims that I feel good about my buying habits for text books does not change. I still must buy the books based on the class requirements. This blog has as much impact as Andy Rooney on 60 Minutes. We read it, we agree or disagree, we move on a little wiser for having spent time with it, but we still buy the books we are told to buy.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
This Week's Blog
When I reviewed my email files to find one to write about I noticed a pattern. The more familiar someone was with you the less information and "niceties" there was in the email. In each of these messages the tone was set in the first line of the email. I knew the content of the message before reading the entire text.
Chase Bank opens their formal business email with Mr. Charles E. Pelaske Jr... This tips me off there may be something legal in the memo. The opening was followed by legal stuff telling me they changed the terms on a credit card I do not use. Publisher's Clearing House does not know me at all. They refer to me as Mr. Pelaske before they offer to fix my financial position. The most familiar was from my brother. “Check this out" was all he wrote and he included a web site address.
Chase tried to maintain a friendly tone. Other than the opening paragraph, the message was bland and unappealing. Writing this type of message is difficult. The ability to deliver bad news while trying to keep customer goodwill takes talent. Chase effectively balanced the bad news by reminding customers of the services available to them for the increased cost.
Publisher's Clearing House sent their usual promotion of giving away millions of dollars. The email was a full page of how the reader could become rich and how others have already become rich by clicking on the link. The sale of actual merchandise does not occur until you have clicked on the link. The tone is upbeat throughout the entire email. They want the reader to feel the sense of urgency to click the link by the use of bold print with underling. These mental pushes are on the key parts requesting the reader to respond now and prompt entry needed. The reference to others that lost because they failed to respond seems mildly threatening. This approach must work because they have been using it for decades.
My brother's email would be impossible to discern a tone in without the entire context of where the link went and why he sent it to me. This short an email may be acceptable between family members. In the work place it would be a mistake, no matter how well or how long you worked with someone. The intended joke could backfire by misinterpretation.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
The World of Rhetoric
The Fox News Channel hits us with the combination of their logo "Fair and Balanced" followed by images of their star reporters to build our perceived ethos of their reporters. Does this rhetoric work for you? It does not work for me. Fox makes further attempts at logos by stating they are America's number one news channel. I watch Fox just for the humor value of the excessive rhetoric. Fox may have a high number of viewers but many could be watching for the same reason as I do.
The attempts to pull at my heartstrings with these pitches become annoying after hearing them continuously. They begin to fall into the clichéd ethos of "4 out of 5 dentists recommends...". I begin to doubt the veracity of the source after hearing the phrases so many times.
I can understand the desire of the news media to build a relationship with their viewers. The result could be beneficial in terms of revenue generated by a growing loyal audience. It may be better to focus on giving us more information in the time slot allowed by reducing the rhetoric.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Writing Class Expectations
Writing has always been easy for me. As long as I am familiar with the subject or have a point to make, I can communicate my ideas in a clear manor. My issue is with writing for a new audience, such as a new manager or for a new teacher in a classroom. Without knowing what they are expecting in style or the specific information my audience is looking for I develop writers block.
For my current writing class I think writing style should not be an issue. In technical writing the format is usually straightforward. Memos have a routine structure that is clear. The information needs to be written as brief as possible while relaying all the facts. Proposals, resumes, and the other types of documents we will be writing will also have predetermined style limits. These style limits improves the possibility of producing documents that will meet or exceed the expectations of the instructor.
The content of the documents we will be writing is still unclear. There remains the opportunity for error in content without some guidance. The directions were clear enough for a few hundred words on writing for this blog. By relaying my thoughts on fulfilling the expectations of my audience, I am hoping for help on learning how to write for a wider audience without the need for too much direction on content.
As the semester progresses we will see how the writing style changes in this blog. I would like to see a clear improvement when comparing this blog entry with my final blog entry at the end of April.